The almost decade-old Couchsurfing, which is available in , cities across the globe, is becoming the go-to hookup app for a certain class of young world travelers. CouchSurfing's Community Guidelines explicitly warn against contacting other members for dating, noting, "we will consider this harassment" — albeit without stipulating what the penalties are for violating this rule. Perhaps, but use of the site to find sexual partners a practice known in some bro-friendly circles as "cooch surfing" is nonetheless quite routine.
I'm like, 'You know, whatever, we went out, had sex They didn't go all the way. Months later Riccardo got a phone call from the same girl, asking if she could stay at his place in New York City. This time, they made it official. Couchsurfing was born after a budget-conscious traveler named Casey Fenton sent out a mass request for accommodations in Iceland and received 50 invitations from students with a free spare futon.
Fenton soon realized people all over the world might not mind sharing their extra space gratis while making new friends in the process.
Today, each of the site's 7 million members has a unique profile which reads like a personal ad, highlighting interests, locations traveled, details about their accommodations and, most important, references. This system allows friends you've made globally or locally to vouch for you and the unlikelihood of you being a serial killer.
Members can request a couch, host a traveler, or find new friends to meet up with locally. Riccardo agrees to host only female travelers and stipulates that they be younger than him. He accepts them based on their attractiveness "of course," but physical appearance isn't the only criterion. I want to have three days with somebody I can talk with.
Not somebody just empty. In Riccardo's case, it all starts with a request for approval — from his pal in Miami. Should I invite her? He got a little closer on his second try, a girl from Slovakia with blonde hair his weakness and small, dark, squinty eyes.
She was in the process of moving to New York and needed a place to stay for four days while she looked for a permanent home. I tried to kiss her. She, was like 'No, no, no—I don't want to make it awkward. Riccardo later learned he'd made a critical error. Experienced couchsurfing casanovas know to hold off on making a move until later.
Your guest is already committed to coming home with you, so why risk the old fashioned approach? His friend later advised him on a more direct strategy. At first, Riccardo could not believe it was that simple.
She was like, 'Okay! Riccardo is asked if he feels sleazy. Why stop, when it's so easy? As Maverick Traveler, a self-proclaimed nomad who "roams the earth, seduces beautiful women," and blogs about his adventures, puts it, "I simply do not know of an easier way for a guy to get laid with exotic women in exotic countries.
According to his blog, he started using the site in "as a tool to get to know a city, meet interesting people, and, of course, to bang chicks. Most of his readers are clearly appreciative of his advice: I didn't know CS was a bangtool," reads one response. Currently she lives in her hometown of Philadelphia, and though single and actively looking, the early twentysomething hasn't met anyone of interest locally.
It's important to stay professional, and guys I train with need to see me as a fighter and a teammate or it gets too complicated. A Couchsurfer since , Jessie has traveled the globe using the service. But it's not a dating site, she insists, "It's a social site. But with anything social, there is sometimes a spark. I'm very passionate and very easily seduced! But once there is a connection, there isn't much holding me back. For instance, this guy in Wales.
Contrary to our expectations, the. Hypothesis 1 could not be. Furthermore, having a sexual or relationship motive influenced self-instigating a. Again, in contrast with our expectations, the number of matches did not influence the number. Regarding other-instigated conversations, however, the. Hypothesis 2 could thus be. Table 2 reports on the offline Tinder behaviours.
Hypothesis 3, which predicted a. While the odds of meeting up with a. Several other significant associations appeared.
Hypothesis 4, which predicted a positive association between the number of Tinder. The odds of having a one-night stand with another Tinder user. Albeit a bit lower, the odds of having a committed relationship with another Tinder user were.
Sexual motive appeared to be an important predictor for both one-night stands. The odds for having a one-night stand with another Tinder. The odds of having casual sexual relationships with another Tinder user were.
In addition, the odds of having a casual sexual relationship with. Relationship motive, on the contrary, was negatively. Finally, serious relationship appeared to be the only other. The odds for having a committed relationship with another Tinder user within the referenced. Hypothesis 6 could not be supported. The number of one-night stands and casual.
Hypothesis 7, which assumed the. Figure 1 shows that all indirect effects between Tinder. Finally, Hypothesis 8 could only be partially supported. While motives played an. In summary, the evidence. This study was undertaken to examine how users go from swiping to romantic or. While swiping is a necessary first step to get acquainted with other users,.
Women in our sample were significantly more likely to have matches than men, a. It is possible that. In her study on mobile phone usage, Shade Cambre, ; Duguay, ; Mason, , it could be possible that women are more. In addition, Lefebvre found that male users were more likely to. Another explanation lies in. The number of successful Tinder matches was only positively associated with the.
Again, sex differences were found, in that women were less likely to start messages but more. This seems to be in line with both the offline. Tinder motiv es also increased odds of starting a conversation:. Both the number of successful self-instigated and other-instigated conversations were. Notably, the longer users have. According to Uses and. It is therefore highly likely that users with successful. Tinder meetings continue to use the application and thus have had the application for a longer.
Alternatively, it is also possible that having the application for a long time. The primary goal of this study, however, was to address the question whether the. Our findings seem to imply some.
On the one hand, our study shows that less than half of. Tinder users in this sample actually met someone in a physical setting they matched with on.
Tinder, which calls in question the success of Tinder as an application that brings people. However, such findings might be country or sample specific, as in another U. On the other hand, it is. These numbers are even. The number of Tinder meetings was significantly and positively associated with both. Interestingly, women were more likely to report a higher number of casual sexual. Contrarily, the literature on casual sex either.
Yet, this study would not be the first to report opposite. As women are more likely to have a higher number of matches, this supply of. Since sexual motive also appeared to be a significant predictor of engagement in both. In this way, Tinder serves as a tool. However, in the case of respondents. In another study conducted in the UK. Bhattacharya, , a female respondent explained that online interactions on Tinder prior. The matching hypothesis aids in a better understanding of these findings.
According to this hypothesis, people are most motivated to pursue romantic relationships. Applied to Tinder, the matching hypothesis suggests that Tinder. Consequently, it is not surprising that a significant proportion of offline. Tinder meetings not only generate casual sexual encounters but are also associated. More than a quarter. Finally, motives played an important role when it comes to studying Tinder outcomes. Having a sexual motive was positively associated with reporting a higher number of one-.
Interestingly, having a relationship motive was not associated with reporting a higher number. Relationship status and sexual experience did not seem to moderate these. The main limitation of this study is that it is cross-sectional and therefore cannot.
Future studies could use a longitudinal design to. Also, future studies could include ex-Tinder users because one reason for. In other words, users are likely to delete. Second, while our operationalization of casual sex included the two most common. While it could be that casual sexual relationships formed on. Tinder are merely sexual in nature for both partners, an alternative possibility is that at least.
Due to the design of this study,. Tinder — qualitative studies are needed for such investigation. If Tinder leads to casual sexual. Getting it on line: Journal of Sociology 44 2: Journal of Experimental Social. New Scientist Not by the book: Facebook as a sampling frame. Research , 41 1: Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship.
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38 1: Seeing and being seen: Society , 17 7 , — Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-.
Computers in Human Behavior, Dating on the net: Revisiting Computer Mediated Communication and Community , ed. Jones, — Casual sexual relationships and experiences.
Emerging Adulthood 1 2: Prelude to a kiss: In Handbook of relationship initiation , ed. Sprecher, 97 — Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile. Journal of Sex Research 46 5: Science in the Public Interest 13 1: Women on the move: Review of General Psychology, 16 2: Regression analyses of counts and rates:.
Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. The ecological approach to visual perception. The transformation of intimacy: Love, sexuality and eroticism in modern. The nature of casual. The Journal of Sex Research, 43 3: Intimacy as a double-edged phenomenon? Social Forces 81 2: Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: Journal of Adolescent Research 28 2: In Sexual Revolutions ,.
Giami, 1 — The mediatization of culture and society. The place of the emplaced mobile: A case study into gendered locative. Dating apps, sex, relationships and.
Journal of Sociology 53 2: Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of. University of California Press. Australian Feminist Studies 26 Engagement in one-night stands in.
Personality and Individual Differences. Facebook as a research tool for the social. American Psychologist 70 6: Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices.
Urban Health 90 4: Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships Grindr casual hook-ups as interactional. Social and life course. The Journal of Sex Research, 52 5: Social media in gay London: Tinder as an alternative to hook-up apps.
Tinder and humanitarian hook-ups: The erotics of social media racism. Feminist Media Studies 16 5: A new standard of sexual behavior? Journal of Sex Research 51 6: Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40 2: Toward a more complete understanding of. Journal of Social and Personal. The Evolution of Coupling. Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: Love at first swipe?
Explaining Tinder self-presentation and. Rethinking the history of American casual sex. Journal of Historical Sociology 27 1: Casual hookups to formal dates: Who we are when we think no one's looking. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Communication and Society 3 1: F eminizing the mobile: Gender scripting of mobiles in North America.
Hook-up practices in the location-. Development and validation of the Tinder. Computers in Human Behavior To Tinder or not to Tinder, that's the question:.
An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Sexual hookups among college students: Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 6:...